---
title: Deciphering Long-Short Fund Expense Ratios
description: There is much to like about well-managed long-short equity funds. Fund managers can seek to generate alpha on both long and short positions, expanding the investment opportunity set in the market.
image: https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/hubfs/LSA-DecipheringLongShort.jpg
---
[](https://longshortadvisors.wpcomstaging.com/)
[Subscribe for Updates ](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/deciphering-long-short-fund-expense-ratios#subscribe)
#### Subscribe for Updates
Receive the latest News & Insights from Long Short Advisors.
[Long Short Advisors Don't Time The Market – Invest In It ](https://longshortadvisors.wpcomstaging.com/)
[February 03, 2023](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/deciphering-long-short-fund-expense-ratios)
##### **SOME SEC RULES HAVE ADDED TO CONFUSION FOR LONG-SHORT FUNDS**
There is much to like about well-managed long-short equity funds. Fund managers can seek to generate alpha on both long and short positions, expanding the investment opportunity set in the market. The ability to short sell lowers a portfolio’s volatility, which makes it more likely that emotional investors will stay in their seats during bear markets such as in 2022. This helps long-term investors earn the equity risk premium across market cycles.
Unfortunately, some new rules regarding the calculation of long-short fund expense ratios introduced by the SEC several years ago have unwittingly reduced fund transparency for investors, made it more difficult to analyze underlying portfolios, and distorted the investment practices of some fund managers. And the increased complexity and opaqueness induced by the change in SEC rules haven’t lowered investor costs.** **
##### **The New Expense Regime**
The rule change requires long-short funds to include short interest and dividend payments in their net expense ratios. Prior to analyzing the implications of this shift, let’s review the mechanics of what occurs in a short sale: The investor borrows shares and sells them on the market, hoping to earn a profit later by buying back the shares at a lower price. The investor doesn’t own the security but pays a spread to the broker that facilitates the lending of shares. In addition, the short borrower of stock must pay dividends issued during this period to the stock’s owner of record. The dividends paid by the short borrower must be included in the fund’s expense ratio.
What is confusing about this SEC policy? It creates several issues. Let’s start with the short interest aspect. When a long-short manager short sells stocks, the proceeds, or collateral, are typically held in cash or cash-equivalent investments that, since the surge in interest rates in 2022, now earn a significant amount of short interest rebate for the portfolio—but this cannot be used to offset the dividend expense line item recorded in the fund’s net expense ratio. Thus, the healthy income on the interest from, say, a 30% short position cannot be used to offset the dividend expense.
If this rule seems unfair, the implication of the dividend expense policy is even worse. All things equal, a fund that is, for instance, 60% net long, will almost certainly earn more in dividend income than it coughs up in dividend expenses to shareholders of record on securities the fund has sold short. But again, the dividend expense must be included in the fund’s net expense ratio whereas dividend income for the same fund cannot be used to net out dividends. There’s also another more-subtle flaw in the dividend expense rule. When a stock goes ex-dividend, it drops in price, which means the short position gains in value. In fact, this dividend event is basically a wash for the investor, but the dividends paid is the only line entry recorded in net expenses.
##### **Distorting Fund Behavior**
To top it all off, the SEC rule change for net expense calculation has resulted in some unintended changes in investment strategy by a number of long-short fund managers that create the illusion of lower expenses and actually increase portfolio complexity, lack of transparency and even risk.
Here’s what we mean. For several reasons, including the difficulty of and unusual skills required for adroit short selling of securities, management fees for 40 Act long-short funds tend to be relatively high, say 1.5% to 1.75%. The interest and dividend expense for short selling can easily add 75 to 100 basis points to the net expense ratio (on top of the management fee) calculation as mandated by the SEC. Say a fund manager seeks to maintain the appearance of a net expense ratio under the threshold of 2%, perhaps to pass a 2% expense ratio filter for an investor or financial advisor. To achieve the illusion of lower expenses, a number of managers have stopped taking individual short positions in their portfolios, and instead are using total-return swaps, options, or other vehicles to short markets or securities. These methods obviously come with a cost, but not costs (unlike interest and dividends) that must be included in the stated net expense ratio. There are, in fact, several downsides to (for instance) a total-return swap strategy, such as making it more difficult to control risk and to understand what’s in the portfolio and at what economic cost. It also eliminates the potential for tax-loss harvesting with individual shares, reduces flexibility for the manager, and adds new risks of derivatives markets, such as counterparty and pricing risk. In real life, derivatives such as total return swaps quite possibly *increase* the cost to investors while they create the illusion of lower expenses per the SEC rule.
##### **Conclusion**
How should investors and financial advisors analyze and evaluate long-short funds in order to get to the bottom of the expense confusion? One way is to essentially ignore the issue and simply focus on a fund’s net return, along with other relevant risk-control metrics such as volatility and maximum drawdowns. *Net return is net return*: the SEC has, unfortunately, added a layer of complexity to the fee structure, but this does not in any tangible way change a long-short fund’s expenses or net return.
16237831-UFD-01312023
##### Recent News & Insights
[ ](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q3-2025-shareholder-letter)
###### [LSOFX Q3 2025 Shareholder Letter](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q3-2025-shareholder-letter)
[October 24, 2025](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q3-2025-shareholder-letter)
[ ](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/bank-ma-could-be-poised-for-a-comeback)
###### [Portfolio Manager Insights: Bank M&A Could Be Poised For a Comeback](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/bank-ma-could-be-poised-for-a-comeback)
[August 28, 2025](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/bank-ma-could-be-poised-for-a-comeback)
[ ](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q2-2025-shareholder-letter)
###### [LSOFX Q2 2025 Shareholder Letter](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q2-2025-shareholder-letter)
[July 16, 2025](https://blog.longshortadvisors.com/news-insights/lsofx-q2-2025-shareholder-letter)
##### LSOFX Quick Links
[](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/4808633/db6299b5-cf49-40b0-9862-bd99dc7be4c6)
[](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/4808633/2053dcc5-4dde-46af-aebf-e389c1c850a7)
[](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/4808633/84103a14-2fa1-486e-b359-15bcceacebf6)
### SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES
3330 Fairchild Gardens Avenue
Suite 30428
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 [info@longshortadvisors.com](mailto:info@longshortadvisors.com) [215.399.9409](tel:2153999409)
### SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES
**You should carefully consider the investment objectives, potential risks, management fees, and charges and expenses of the Fund before investing. The Fund's prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing. You may obtain a current copy of the Fund's prospectus by calling (877) 336-6763. **
Investment in shares of a long/short equity fund have the potential for significant risk and volatility. A short equity strategy can diminish returns in a rising market as well as having the potential for unlimited losses. These types of funds typically have a high portfolio turnover that could increase transaction costs and cause short-term capital gains to be realized.
The Fund may lose money due to fluctuations within the stock market which may be unrelated to individual issuers and could not have been predicted. The price of the securities which the Fund holds may change unpredictably and due to local, regional, international, or global events. In the case of a general market downturn, multiple asset classes, or the entire market, may be negatively affected for an extended and unknown amount of time.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Diversification cannot ensure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. It is a strategy used to help mitigate risk
Distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC. Member [FINRA](https://www.finra.org/#/)
Long Short Advisors is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There is no affiliation between Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC, Long Short Advisors, and the other firms referenced on this website.